Good Source for differing points of view...
http://www.globalwarming.org/
The heat has really hit the fan on the Global Warming debate. But, Barbara Boxer isn't mincing theory, numerical equations or falsified data to fit the desired conclusion.
During the economic slump, behavioral changes of people out of work, resulted in a drop in U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Period.
Boxer made the point that "the poor economy has been great for the climate."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We've got two sets of scientists brandishing their fuzzy calculations: oil industry and IPCC scientists..the fact remains that humans contribute to the overall warming of the planet.
ReplyDeleteThere's an excellent piece at
Spiegel Online Climatologists Baffled by Global Warming Time-Out
www.spiegel.de/international/world
1. Developing Changes do not occur in a straight line
2. Computer modeling can't determine future climate changes
3. Human influence changes as was recognized by the drop in greenhouse gases when there was less manufacturing, jobs, car trips, etc..
4. Weaker solar activity