HACKS OF ANY POLITICAL ILK LOSE CREDIBILITY

What do we mean by calling them hacks?

They're simply out to destroy the reputations of any candidate who opposes their candidate by any unethical or dishonest means.

The Braublog Minnpost article URL is below.

We're not even going to mention their names, let's just say their reputations for skirting the line between fact and fiction proceeds them.

To the contrary, the AP piece picked up by MN Progressive, was FACT on.

Though it's not PHL's policy to pick on the children of politicians, of any political persuasion.
Minnpost is right, does any of this have to do with reducing our $6M deficit? No.

And to that fact, Tom Emmer is the last one of the three running to seriously address
the deficit with a budget everyone can examine.

The candidates themselves need to send a clear message to hacks spreading rumors on their behalf. STOP.

Our message to both these political hacks: your credibility is further damaged by passing off sloppy research as fact. One gets the idea that you can't win on policy so you just create scandals where none exist.

By stooping to such tactics, you defeat your own purpose, and actually make your party and your candidate look desperate.

http://www.minnpost.com/braublog/2010/09/02/21119/why_ap_spiked_the_emmer_son_drinking_story_that_city_pages_ran